Which is not really news, but it might be interesting to note the prices/plans - starts at SGD 56 (USD 40) and SGD 348 (USD 245).

SingTel is making the iPhone 3G affordable for everyone. We're introducing a great new range of iFlexi plans that are loaded with BONUS mobile data for Mobile Internet Browsing, and extended free Wireless@SG. These plans have been specially built for you and your iPhone to deliver fantastic value, make sure you ask for an iFlexi plan when you sign up.

Data allowance above is a limited offer; only for customers who connect or recontract with SingTel on an iFlexi plan between launch and 5 September 2008.



All iFlexi plans feature free incoming calls.

Nano-Proprietary (now, apparently APNT), previously blamed for the delays in rolling out SED televisions, has lost what seems to be an important appeal.

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has found that the “irrevocable, perpetual” licence agreement APNT had granted to Canon could not be terminated by APNT “notwithstanding a material breach of the agreement”. APNT dropped 17% from USD 1.09 on the Friday (25th July 2008) the decision was filed to USD 0.90 on the following Monday.

The court also confirmed that, by virtue of the licence agreement between APNT and Canon, Canon can now grant to its wholly owned subsidiary, SED Inc., a valid sublicence use the relevant APNT patents. Subsequent to APNT's initial claim SED Inc. was restructured from what was effectively a 50/50 joint venture between Canon and Toshiba into a 100% Canon subsidiary.

This is the first appeal. We're not familiar with the US appeals system, but judgment was only filed on 25th July 2008 (which we think makes it likely that it has not yet been decided whether there is any right to a further appeal). There’s a press statement from APNT dated 28th July which states that their counsel is currently “considering options”.

SED - hello glorious 55" screen with 1ms and 50,000:1 contrast - might yet appear!

[First seen at the Arstechnica forums in a post by Biggiesized]

Symplification obviously hasn't been updated for some time, and the way things are going it's likely that they're not going to be.

It's not just the "new" job (and sometimes World of Warcraft, hehehe) - it's also that since that new job started I've been using a blackberry (with an unlimited data plan), and that single device provides basically all of the functionality I need.

For example, I have an N80 - but as it's music playing capabilities were rendered useless by an ipod shuffle (which is about the same size as the adaptor it needed for me to plug proper headphones in - and has much better sound quality through my super.fi 5 pros), the only thing I use it for nowadays is to actually make phone calls. Yeah - not even SMS.

Indeed, assuming you have Gmail App (for email) and the newest version of velvetpuffin (for instant messaging - disclosure, I've acted for the owner of velvetpuffin before) I don't think there's actually any reason to have a smartphone - anything which has data (preferably 3G) and supports those applications will do! So - buying a phone will become something which is almost -completely- about how you feel about the device.

And this is from the perspective of someone who actually uses a smartphone as a smartphone... (which is a whole other reason to think that "smartphones" are a waste).

It is, of course, possible to argue that I've just lost the faith, and it's also perfectly accurate to point out that phones are branching out even more than ever before (GPS, for example) - but unfortunately I suspect that it's all about usability, and the swiss-army knife device is likely to be inferior to the "real deal" (e.g. look how the prices of standalone GPS devices have fallen, and think about how much easier it is to have a nice big screen when being directed; or consider something how the creative zen stone plus manages to have a screen and 2GB in a device basically same size as the shuffle).

So - bye for the moment, and thanks for all your clicks! I'm likely to create some other website soon, because that's kinda fun. Don't know what it'll be about though... hmm. I did recently buy a new camera...

[sorry about that - I was getting too many spam comments - send me email if you have something to say, and I'll update accordingly ^.^]

According to news.com.com (*koff koff horrible url*) the iPhone is going to be announced on the first day of WWDC.

Cool.

This means that Nokia (and the other usual suspects - Moto, SE, Samsung, etc.) still have more than 2 months left. For Nokia, by their usual standards, this means that if they are going to have a direct iPhone competitor (touchscreen etc.) it has to be announced within the next couple of days.

We don't think the announced yesterday Nokia 5700 (pictured above) is it, although we do admit to liking some of the new styling cues.

Quick! Touchscreen device with symbian, multi-touch (like this!) tech, blackberry connect, 3.5mm plug and the music quality of at least an ipod shuffle, and I'm sold (if I were planning on getting an iPhone, and the multi-touch actually works such that our concerns about painful interfaces are misplaced).

[via Engadget]

Nokia Press release: "New York, NY - Nokia, a world leader in mobile communications, and EMI Music, one of the world's leading music companies, have announced a marketing and content agreement in which EMI artists, beginning with Capitol Music Group artists Lily Allen and Red Jumpsuit Apparatus, will be featured in Nokia's Flagship Store locations worldwide, as well as Nokia's Experience Centers, theater locations and certain Nokia music-related websites across North America. EMI will be the exclusive major label provider of music content for the retail program, and new content from its artists will be added and featured every 60 days."

I don't know why the "Ring Nokia" chap thinks DRM won't be involved in the deal - most current Nokia devices are compliant with the Open Mobile Alliance (OMA) 2.0 DRM standard, and while EMI has flirted with the distribution of DRM-free music, I don't see anything in the press release which suggests that the content provided won't be locked down.

Who knows.

On a brighter note, lets hope that this is the beginning of a beautiful relationship. With the iPhone approaching, it would be a really good idea for Nokia to have an answer to the iTunes Music Store (operators have been trying their darndest) and OTA downloads would be useful- although to be honest, given the Zune's current lack of the feature it's entirely unclear if even the iPhone will sport this functionality.

Bleah. We were wrong, and it does appear that all Ferrari and Vertu had to announce was a new phone cover - the Vertu Ascent Ferrari 1947 Limited Edition. Of course we're basing this on the information which we received.

That information is basically identical to the information chronicled over at Darla Mack's blog, so I shan't belabor the point.

It's interesting that Vertu's own website (as of the date and time of this article) has not yet been updated with the official press release. Having said all that, since it's a Vertu Ascent, we'd expect the specifications to be identical to existing Vertu Ascents - which basically means that if you want a basic phone it should serve you well.

Pity.

We would post pictures, but as all existing pictures appear to be from the same source, and aren't of the best quality (although we're not entirely sure why, since EXIF data shows that the camera involved was a Nikon D100, which is old, but is still based on a sensor very similar to current DSLRS) we shan't bother for the moment. :D

[source: little bird! Hooray for little bird! :D]

A little birdie has told us that Vertu and Ferrari will be launching some oh-so-new thing in Italy tomorrow.

Ferrari hasn't been a laggard in promoting it's brand across product lines - Acer's Ferarri laptop was one of the first automobile manufacturer-branded laptops around, and Vertu has released products which include trade marks they presumably do not own (e.g. the "Racetrack Legends" Limited Editions).

We'll keep you updated - it's probably just (another) new phone, just co-branded with Ferarri, but we hope for something really NEW - like a Vertu which has Symbian inside ;) Note that the little birdie said nothing about that.

[Image credit: Webshots! - A Ferrari F430 in (partial) Vertu livery]

So Apple's iPhone is here.

While official specs aren't out yet, and apple hasn't officially released any images of the phones other than full frontal shots, Arstechnica and engadget have enough between them that you generally know what to expect.

But even with a nice big (480*320) 3.5" touchscreen, 8GB of memory, sound quality which should be better than the N80's and a nice exterior, it still falls short of the N95 in certain ways - the two most important being dedicated keys and 3G.

The reason for this omission of dedicated keys is pretty obvious - the iPhone can't, in this day of uber-thin/small phones, be monstrous in size. Since a large screen was deemed to be important (and it is excellent marketing material) the device had to be thin (and it is, at 11.6mm) and so there's simply no space. This means that all keys must be "soft" keys - press bits of the touchscreen to get it. I don't know if you've used a touchscreen for this before, but it really sucks. Really. Really really. Unless Apple has used some sort of better touchscreen which can actually detect "button-presses" with at least 99.9% efficiency, I know i'm going to get frustrated using the iPhone as a the phone (sms).

The lack of 3G (UTMS or EV-DO) might also be related to "thinness". We would like to hope that it's omission was due to the fact that the US telephone market is engaged in something akin to a VHS/betamax war, and that handsets intended for the rest of the world would include it, but surely that would have been announced, especially since this is (very unusually for Apple) not an "availability" release, but rather a pre-announcement of the Nokia variety (i.e. not available now but hey - we're working on it). Perhaps that was because they knew that once the device was sent in for FCC approval, it would be plastered everywhere (example) In any case, the lack of 3G means that video calling (and conferencing!) is not part of the package. The lack of video conference ability is strange, as this would have been a really interesting iChat device otherwise. Also, surfing on EDGE is possible, but definitely comparatively painful.

Apart from that, there are a few other, more minor features, which the iPhone lacks. It doens't have the N95's GPS, and it's not a symbian device. These are probably not as important to the iPhone's target demographic, but are still interesting points to note.

I suspect that in the end all the above doesn't really matter in the medium term - the iPhone is not going to be a failure (too much market expectation), and Apple can always release a device with another form factor/functionality. But in the short term, I'm doubt that the iPhone will sway me from purchasing the N95 - or perhaps i'm not in it's target demographic...